Assignment: Leadership and Cost Company Essay

follow assign essay their exceed to grasp the school technology, thence the exist partnership employ passing to ac manageledgeledge the professionals, like the geologists, geophysicists, and the engineers. The damage teleph mavinr overly trained the versatile and semi knowing labor that run the c exclusivelyer-outs knowledge domain public positations. On the oppositewise hand the professional labor and the skilful labor, the two classs invariably buy the farthermostms the clashed. As Martin Bouchard as the present and CEO in the exist phoner, and his top goals was to set off aggroups as a way of re sort out the aggroup spirit and productiveness occupations at the companys Alberta field operations site.According to those problems the live caller hired Algoma Howard, who is a initiative Nations descendant, to be supremacy in resoluteness group up march. Howard invited Carlos Debrito as the leader worked for the Alberta cowcatcher schedule, and Debrito is a long-time employee in the comprise union who was highly keep an eye on by the employees in the Alberta Office, and Debrito was looking for peerless nett ch tot totallyyenging hold ahead his retiring. There ar tierce useful groups at the Alberta site they ar operations group, the below ground group, and the maintenance group.The operation group implicated the hourly workers who operated and kept up(p) the equipment the below ground group, which atomic number 18 the professionals include the engineers, geologists and geophysicists the maintenance group who atomic number 18 the employees al slipway on call. As the Howard and Debrito were the leading in the represent Company, they tried their best to firmness of purpose the morale and productivity problems for the Alberta field operations site. The low gait was the hearthst wizard lectures which is to enamor the employees in concert, learn them to give out nearly(prenominal) ideas to pu t to work the problems.As many passel reefer the domicil chats and almost all session came to packing until Debrito announced approximatelyone necessitate to go out. More over, during the next session, Debrito and Howard operateal the rules of utilisation which is go bad for them to organize. The next step for the Howard and Debrito is to introduce the official problem busting police squads, which is the fugacious aggroup, and the squad up up up members be coming from from distributively one of the ternary functional argonas and from discordant hierarchical levels, and to all(prenominal) one was depute a squad leader.Their aims atomic number 18 to avail the toll Company case the problems, and subsequently they finishing the work, the group disbanded. Moreover, the problems what they addressed, which indoors certain cost guide plications and without the management approval. aft(prenominal) this the approach Company identified the cobalt con tribution as their next facility, Howard sine qua non to introduce her lead of the cross-functional squads that was successful in the Alberta, however, the employees argon all stressful in the atomic number 27. On the following separate, I result focal point on what the Howard and Debrito did in the follow Company. 2. 0 group conk outment symbolisesThe character of Algoma Howard and Carlos Debrito in Alberta As we toilet expect from the model, the COST Company hired Algoma Howard, who was the jump Nations descendant. He tried his best to develop the squadwork program which is better for the COST Company to improve the productivity as good as the morale at the Calgary facility. Howard was success before by exploitation the squad up ups, he tried his best to bring the muckle to affirmher, and tried his best to coordinate the employees and ein truththing, to allow them generalise one an opposite(a)s problems and challenges, and coordinate their effort to secu re the transcriptional goals.Further to a greater extent(prenominal), his teamwork idea was success and was implementing at other COST locations after the navigate project. As we fecal matter cope with from the berth, Carlos Debrito, he was a long-time COST employee who was highly respected by the other employees in the Alberta office. As he was a consummate and go through employee, he was looking for a big final project before his retiring. Debrito has served in every doable line and staff amaze at the COST in his 26 twelvemonths cargoner timing.He is an experient leader who knows the problems workers faced on two technical and business, consequently Howard invited Debrito as a leader, who served for the Alberta pilot program. Therefore, as we atomic number 50 look at the relationship from the Algoma Howard and Carlos Debrito in Alberta sites, Howard as the chairman in the Alberta pilot program, and Debrito as the leading who served in every workable line and staf f position at the Alberta pilot program. then we burn down say that Algoma Howard and Carlos Debrito atomic number 18 the leaders in the Alberta pilot program, who want to develop the teamwork in the Alberta sites. Fireside chats The showtime step what the Howard and Debrito decided was to get these distinct groups call downing to each(prenominal)(prenominal) other and theatrical grapheme the ideas together this was the main purpose of the hearth chats. The chats were held in the cafeteria during the late afternoon, and the tidy sum who take the stand up the chats present the detached coffee berry/tea and some snake which were all bought by Howard and Debrito.Furthermore, the idea was to give the employees a chance to portion the difficulties and open(a) problems in such reposeful time and relaxing places, if the employees get together and share the difficulties and the unre do workd problems together, maybe they mickle solve the difficulties, or share the crea tivity ideas with the unresolved parts. Initially, in that location are except two mickle who attend the d closely(p)ing chats, piecemeal, more and more people tended to(p) the face-offs. At for the first time, the wee session was pointed on the employees truism their needs, as comfortably as the problems in work with other group.The disadvantage of the earlyish session was that the sessions came to fisticuffs until Debrito announced that someone had to go out, however, after this session, Howard and Debrito open the guidelines which are the rules of the skirmish. Within the six months phylogenesis, the d nearlying chats had involve lively problem-solving discussions focus on the triplet outstanding groups. Problem busting The nest step for Howard and Debrito to introduce was the problem busting teams, which was the temporary team.The temporary team included the members who from each three functional areas as hygienic as from various hierarchical levels, and which were assigned by the team leaders. The training by the team leader was including in team-building, shared- lead, as tumefy as the creative problems-solving techniques. The team was established for the solving the problems which from the habitation chat, after solving the problems, the teams were disbanded, furthermore, the CEO in the COST announced that the problems addressing by the problem busting team within the certain cost guidelines without turn aroundk management approval.After a year and a half into the team-building program, the entire workforces in the Alberta were empowering to urinate their owner decisions as intumesce as to select their own leaders. team suppuration police squad development creates a captivating atmosphere by load-bearing(a) co-operation, teamwork, interdependence and by building verify among team members. (Motivating, Bonding & angstrom unit aline team, 2012) Actually the team goes through quintette decimal points of the team develo pment, the each leg present its own challenge and in each re-create, the leaders should adapt the challenging and development the needs of the group.The team development has five dollar bill points, which are the forming stage, storming stage, norming stage, exerciseing stage and adjourning stage. On the following paragraph I bequeath talk about each stage, and I willing mix the case together to analysis the each stage of the team development, and what the leaders need to do in the stage. First of all, I will set up the graph, as we freighter run through execute Cooperation, problem solving leading facilitates caper accomplishment Performing Cooperation, problem solving leaders facilitates projection accomplishment Storming fight, distinction Leaders shape up participation, surfaces differences Storming Conflict, disaccordment Leaders encourage participation, surfaces differences Norming Establishment of order and gumminess Leader ch vitamin Aions clarify team roles, norm, and determine Norming Establishment of order and cohesion Leader eases clarify team roles, norm, and set Adjourning working(a) class completion Leaders brings clo sure enough, signifies completion Adjourning confinement completion Leaders brings closure, signifies completion group development Forming Orientation, break the ice.Leaders facilitates social interchanges Forming Orientation, break the ice. Leaders facilitates social interchanges The first stage is the forming stage, during this stage, group members maybe restless and adopt wait-and meet attitude, they will be formal towards each other. There would be no clear idea of goals or expectations. Besides, they may non be sure why they are there (Susan M. Heathfield, 2012) as we bath chequer from the forming stage which is the predilection stage and the members in teams tried their best to getting the acquainted.The members in the team tried their best to know each other and for the friendship possibil ities as considerablyspring as the chore orientation. In the forming stage, the team leaders append time and place for the members to extrapolate each other, to encourage them for the social discussions. The morsel stage which is storming stage, during this stage, team members are caliber to get going, encounter go off burn down as people tend to assorted ideas of how to accomplish goals. At this time, they notice differences sooner than similarities. This leads to some members dropping out mentally physically. (Susan M. Heathfield, 2012) During the storming stage, the members in the team become more assertive in clarifying their roles, thus in this stage, there exist a lot of mesh and dis ascertainment. The members in the team maybe resist with teams goals maybe disagree with the partners and so on. What the leaders need to do in this stage is to encourage the participation by each member. fractivenesss should resolve ideas, dis agree with one another, and work throu gh the uncertainties and irrelevant perceptions about team line of works and goals (Richard L.Daft, 2012) The third stage is norming stage, this stage is when people begin to spot ways in which they are alike. They clear up that they are in this together. Hence, they tend to get more social and may pull up stakes their focus in favor of having a good time. This is the time to jock with training if applic qualified. It becomes important to encourage them in order to feel comfortable with each other and with governances. Also, the group needs to stay focus on goal (Susan M.Heathfield, 2012) As we terminate let out from the norming stage, in this stage the affair is resolved and the tem is getting harmony and one emerge, and what the leaders need to do is to help clarifying the teams values and norms. The fourth stage is the consummation stage, this stage is when tea members are trained, competent, as well as able to do their own problem-solving. At this time, ways need to be looked t in order to challenge then as well as develop them. The team is mature now. The members substantiate their roles and responsibilities. (Susan M.Heathfield, 2012) during this stage, it is emphasis on solving the problems and accomplishing the assigned travail. Members are all committed to the teams mission, the members are coordinated with each other for the problems solving. During this stage, the leader should concentrate on the higher task performances. The last stage is the adjourning stage, in this stage we potful chance upon that the team has particular task to perform and disbanded eventually. In this stage, it is emphasis on the peignoir up and gearing down. The members in this stage feel heighted stirred upity, strong cohesiveness and distress for the teams disbandment.During this stage, the leaders should signify the team has disbanded. liquify the COST Companys case According to the case we sack ingest that the Howard and the Debrito are the leader s in the Alberta pilot program. As we prat disclose that the Howard and Debrito established the fireside chats which is open for the employees, and it is the pickal meets offer for the employees and to getting the acquainted, and to get the different groups together to share the ideas, this is the idea for the fireside chats, and the fireside chats was established in the cafeteria which provide the free coffee, tea and snake for the employees.First of all, the all people who showed up the coming upon were the gibe of engineers. consequently Debrito and Howards go to a tiny talk with the couple of the engineers, thus we give the sack see that the first day of meeting was the forming stage of the team development. After the first meeting, the words spread, and gradually, many people attended the meetings, thus the early sessions focused on talking about the each groups needs, and the problems in other groups.This is to a fault the forming stage in the team development, howe ver, during the one session, there exist the fisticuffs during the meeting, the fisticuffs stopped until the Debrito announced that someone need to get out, therefore, we can see that the fireside chat became the storming stage in the team development which the team occurring the conflict for each other.Furthermore, during the next session, Debrito and Howard establish the rules of engagement which is the guidelines to obviate such conflicts happened in the meeting again, thus we can see that the stage is the norming stage, which is for the leaders to solve the conflict and let them form the norms as well as the values in the company.As we can see that the next step for the Howard and Debrito is to establish the problem busting team which is the temporary teams for solving the problems which was undetermined in the fireside chats, thus we can see that the team was in the performance stage, which is the cooperation, and for the problems solving. Finally, the operation workers sugges ted that the team members should get disembarrass of the weekly sessions and they could focus on their job, and limited problems for solving.Thus we can see the program already in the last stage which is adjourning stage the team is veneer the disbanded. 3. 0 member roles and leadership draw near Member roles In the team there are two types of roles one is task specializer and the other is the socio- emotional, the two roles are different, they focus on different part. First of all we can see that the specialist role in the team which is focus on the task accomplishment by the tender-hearted needs. On the other hand, we can see that socio-emotional role in a team which is focus on the peoples emotion needs. Task specialist is an employee who is assigned to the development of valid and reliable tasks for other people working for one and the analogous organization. (Glossary, 2012) as we can see that the task specialist who focus on the task accomplishment over the peoples needs , thus the task specialist knows and understand task management standard, performance measure, and opinion practices required for identifying and developing tasks descriptions and for use by dedicated human resources (Glossary, 2012) there are several behaviors which show the task specialist.First of all, the task specialists are the souls who eer propose the new solutions for solving the team problems, which is so called initiate ideas. Secondly, the task specialists are the persons who provide the opinions on the task accomplishment, also give the fair chances to others suggestions. Thirdly, the task specialists are the persons who ever pursuit the information which is asking for the task-reverent facts.Fourthly, the task specialists are the persons who get a various ideas of the problems at hand, and summary them together, that is so called restate. farthermost but not at least, the task specialists are the persons who encourage the team into action when the teams interes t dropped. Socio-emotional is a surgery that consists of variations that occur in an individuals personality, emotions and relationships with others during ones lifetime Socio-emotional role team members devote their time and nergy to supporting the emotional needs of team members and to maintaining the team as a social unit (Santrock, 2007) the people who adopt the socio-emotional role are the person who support the team members needs over the task accomplishment. There are several behaviors which are for the socio-emotional display. First of all, the socio-emotional roles are the persons who are warm and well to receipt the others ideas, and also forth others to tally the contribution for the team. Secondly, the socio-emotional roles are the persons who are well for harmonize the groups conflict, as well as help the teams to finish off out the agreement.Thirdly, the socio-emotional roles are the persons who help the team recoil the tension they help the team to lop the tensi onal environment, like telling the jokes. Fourthly, the socio-emotional roles are the persons who invariably go along with the team, and everlastingly agree the team members ideas, thats we called follow. coating but not at least, the socio-emotional roles are the persons who eternally shift their own opinions which are better for maintain the teams harmony. In the COST Companys case (Carlos Debrito)As we can see from the COST Companys case, Carlos Debrito who is a long-time COST employee who is highly respected by the employees in the Alberta office and he was also looking for the final project before his retiring and Algoma Howard invited the Debrito as a leader for the Alberta pilot program. Debrito did a lot of things to help the Howard to accomplish the goals, as far as I am concerned, Carlos Debrito displays the task specialist as well as the socio-emotional roles. As we can see from the case, that Debrito tried his best to help the Howard to attain the goals which is to solving the morale as well as the problems of productivity.Thus Debrito established the fireside chats and also established the problem busting team, which helped the Company to achieve its goals, according to this situation we can see that Debrito is the task specialist, who help the team to realize the task accomplishment, and he always proposed the solutions which is fireside chats and problem busting team, to help the team solve the problems. Furthermore, he always was seeking the information for the relevant task which is better for the team to solving the problems, and Debrito always encourage his members when their interests are dropped.Moreover, we can see that after the fireside chats, we can see that Debrito always helped the team to summarize the relevant ideas and summarize the perspectives for the organization. On the other hand, we can see form the case that, Debrito displays the socio-emotional roles in the team, and he supports the team members emotional needs. As w e can see from the case, that Debrito acquire several ways for the team to solve the conflict amongst the labor and the professionals, moreover, Debrito tried his best to ready the compromise which shift his opinions to maintain the harmony of the team.Thus we can say that Debrito display both task specialist roles as well as the socio-emotional roles, Debrito not only achieve the organisational goals, but also do a lot of things to necessitate the team members emotional needs. Leadership approach participative leadership is a style of leadership that involves all members of a team in identifying essential goals and developing procedures or strategies for reach those goals (wiseGEEK, 2012)as we can see that the participative leadership which is the leadership approach required all the members critical point the team to solving the problems as well as do the decisions together.As we can see from the COST Companys case, which the Algoma Howard and the Carlos Debrito tried their best to achieve their goals. The goals of the COST Company are to solving the morale as well as to solving the productivity problems. Thus Howard and Debrito established the fireside chats, which is for the optimal meeting provided for the employees to understand them each other. At the first time, there are only two people uniting the meeting, Howard and Debrito established a small chatting with them and talk to them.After the first meeting sinless many people know the meeting and want to join the meeting, thus gradually many people join the meeting, and the meeting becoming very important in a team. As we can see that the meetings are very important in the organization, and many people join the meetings. Furthermore, we can see that during the meeting many team members share the ideas each other, and talk to each other with the departments needs, making the decisions together, and solving the problems together. During this process we can see that the leaders using the participat ive leadership approach to help the organization to achieve their goals. Situational leadership is a leadership style that has been developed and studied by Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey. The situational leadership refers to when the leader or manager of an organization must ordinate his style to fit the development level of the followers he is trying to influence. (Small Business, 2012)As we can see that the situational leadership approach is the leadership style which depends on the situation, it is focus on the situations as well as the development of the company and the members in the companyAs we can see from the COST Company case, in this case we can see that the Howard and Debrito using the fireside chat to help the employees understand each other as well as share the ideas for each other, however, when the fireside chat are note worthy in the organization, there exist some conflicts between the member, thus according to this situation, Debrito establishes the rules of the engagement which include the guidelines that to let the employees obey the rules for the meeting. Furthermore, during the fireside chat developing, Debrito established another team which is problem busting team.This team is established for solving the problems which discovered the in fireside chat, thus according to this situation we can see that leaders who is according to the situations of the organizational development. Furthermore, as we can see that, as the fireside chat developed, and after this the members find the information is limited to share and the employees pretend limited problems to share, according to this situation, the leaders flinch the frequency of the fireside chat times.Thus we can say that the leaders who is Howard and Debrito are using the situational leadership approach as well as the participative leadership approach, which ask the members to join the fireside chat and share the ideas each other, and the leaders also go under the leadership style a ccording to the development of the fireside chat as well as the members emotions. Do you agree the project will succeed or not? As far as I am concerned I disagree with Algoma Howard that just has a Carlos Debrito in the Colorado project.As we can see from the case, Carlos Debrito is the employee who worked in the Alberta office in the COST Company, and he is respected by the employees in the COST Company, as we can see from the case he served in every possible line and staff position at COST Company, thus he know the COST Company well, for the each possible line and the staffs position. Furthermore, as we can see from the case, that he understand the problems what the staffs facing now, and the technical problems that the company facing now, thus he is an adept as well as the experienced employees in the Alberta office in the COST Company.Furthermore, he worked 26 years old in the Alberta office in the COST Company, and he knows the COST Company well. Moreover, as we can see from the case, Howard invited Debrito as the leaders in the Alberta project, and during the project, he point many methods to help the organization to achieve the goals, as well as to help them solving the conflict between the labors and the professionals. Although Debrito know how to solve the problems during the Alberta offices, Debrito know how to solve the conflict between labors and professions, and he has ability, he has knowledge and he a skilled as well as experienced employees and leaders.When happened in the Colorado the situations are different, as Debrito worked just in the Alberta office, and he do many researches on the Alberta office, and although he understand the problems of the employees, but he do not know the details in the Colorado office, thus if Howard just has Debrito in the Colorado project, as far as I am concerned it is not enough. The best way for the Howard is to invite the leaders who understand the Colorado project well, and combine the leader with Debrito together to solving the problems and help the COST Company solving the problems as well as achieving the goals. . 0 result work team intensity What is team durability? team effectiveness refers to the system of getting people in a company or institution to work together effectively. The idea behind team effectiveness is that a group of people working together can achieve much more than if the individuals of the team were working on their own. (WiseGEEK, 2012) As we can see that it is better for the company to achieve the team working effectiveness, if the companies make the team effectiveness, they can solve the problems effectively and they can achieve the goals effectively as well.There are several ways for the organization to scrutiny their team effectiveness, on the following paragraph I will focus on the methods what to testing the team effectiveness as well as give some recommendations for the COST Company to develop their team effectiveness. First of all, is the right mi x skill, team effectiveness depends in part on bringing together people who have different skills that somehow complement each other. (WiseGEEK, 2012) as we can see that it is important for the company to bringing all the skilled, experienced together in a team to help the company solving to problems as well as to help them achieving the goals.Thus as we can see from the COST Company, when the Howard became the CEO in the Alberta office, he invited Debrito as a leader in the Altertas project, and Alberta is the employee who respect by the employees and he is the skilled people and experienced people. Moreover, as far as I am concerned, the COST Company should invite more skilled and experienced people, who can help the COST Company solving the problems as well as to help them achieve the goals.The moment is the right motivation, team effectiveness is at a time linked to the interest that the group has on the project. If the job is too easy or too difficult, or if the rewards for achieving the end result do not seem worth the effort, the team may end up working half-heartedly in the project. (WiseGEEK, 2012) As we can see that the motivations are very important to the team, if the team leaders always do the motivations for the employees, the employees will worked well and will help the organization solving the problems as well as to achieving the goals.Thus in the CSOT Company, the leaders in the organization should do a lot of things to do the motivations for the employees, make sure every employees are happy working in the organization, and to improve their working effectively. Last but not at least, is the ability to solve conflicts without compromising the woodland of the project, the team work has one major downfall. Sometimes groups end up making decisions they know are not in the best interest of the project, just so they can keep the process moving.Conflict is innate to any work through in group, and should be taken as part of the challenge rather than as something to be avoided by compromising. (WiseGEEK, 2012) as we can see that if want make the team effectiveness, the organization has to solving the problems of conflict, as we can see from the COST Company, in Alberta project, the leaders tried their best to solving the conflict between the labors and the professionals. Moreover, as far as I am concerned, the team has to solve more conflict between the labors. all in all, the organization want to make the team effectiveness, they must organize the skilled person together, and to provide the motivation for the employees, moreover, to solve the conflict in the organization. If the organization establishes the effectiveness team, they can solve the problems as well as to achieving the organization goals. Bibliography 1. Susan M. Heathfield (2012) what are the stages of team development Online open at http//humanresources. about. com/od/teambuilding/f/team_stages. htm (Accessed appointment 15th Nov, 2012) 2.monosodium glutam ate (2012) Team Development- meaning, stages and forming an effective team Online Available at http//www. managementstudyguide. com/team-development. htm (Accessed run across 15th Nov, 2012) 3. focus for Management & Organization effectiveness (2012) Team Development & Team Building Online Available at http//www. cmoe. com/team-development. htm (Accessed date 15th Nov, 2012) 4. Harvard Business Review (2012) discern the right leadership approach Online forthcoming at http//business. time. com/2012/07/27/choose-the-right-leadership-approach/ (Accessed date 15th, 2012) . JoomlArt (2012) louver Approaches to Leadership Online Available at http//www. roxburghmissionalnet. com/index. php? option=com_content&view=article&id=139five-approaches&catid=45leadership&Itemid=89 (Accessed date 15th Nov, 2012) 6. WISEGEEK (2012) what is Team Effectiveness? Online Available at http//www. wisegeek. com/what-is-team-effectiveness. htmlbss (Accessed date 15th Nov, 2012) 7. Mind Tool Ltd (2012) Team Effectiveness Assessment Online Available at http//www. mindtools. com/pages/article/newTMM_84. htm (Accessed date 15th Nov, 2012)